Nathaniel Rowland : Family, Parents and Samantha Josephson murder Case

Nathaniel Rowland A South Carolina man was sentenced to life in prison Tuesday for the 2019 abduction and murder of a 21-year-old university student who mistook his car for her Uber ride know all like Family, Parents , Samantha Josephson murder Case

Nathaniel Rowland’s parents cited that he has to pay for what he did if this case was genuine. What did he Suspect Nathaniel do? determine within the article below.Nathaniel is that the prime suspect within the murder case of Samantha Josephson.Recently, he visited the case trial.Yet, there are confusing medical reports about the DNA being found on the suspect’s nails.

Rowland’s motive for killing Samantha isn’t well noted here.However, consistent with some sites, his parents ask him as an innocent young lad, then did the medical reports.Currently, 2 medical reports about the DNA are being circulated on the web . One about finding zero amount of DNA under Rowland’s nail. Whereas another about finding the DNA under the suspect’s fingernails.

Nathaniel Rowland Parents and Family

Nathaniel Rowland was born to oldsters Henry Rowland and Loretta Rowland.According to Henry and Loretta, their son is innocent, and he didn’t kill Samantha Lee Josephson.On the opposite hand, they also cited that their son has got to buy what he did if this case was true.

His father Henry said, ‘If he did it, I’d be the primary one to place him behind bars, lock him up, and throw away the key.”Nathaniel Rowland is from an African background.His family has an ancestor rooting within the African heritage.His family is currently residing in Brooklyn, New York, within the us .Rowland was raised in Columbia, South Carolina.Later, he studied at South Carolina State University and is additionally the CEO at DYMOO/PYNK DYMOO.

Nathaniel Rowland murder Case of Samantha Josephson

A South Carolina man was sentenced to life in prison Tuesday for the 2019 abduction and murder of a 21-year-old university student who mistook his car for her Uber ride.The jury took a touch quite an hour to seek out Nathaniel Rowland guilty of killing Samantha Josephson, a University of South Carolina student who disappeared from Columbia’s Five Points entertainment district in March 2019.

“Her dreams were my dreams, and her death was my death. I close my eyes, and that i feel what she endured at his hands,” the victim’s mother, Marci Josephson, said during the sentencing phase of Rowland’s trial Tuesday.The student from Robbinsville, New Jersey, got into Rowland’s car thinking it had been an Uber ride that might take her back to her apartment, prosecutors said. Instead, she found herself trapped because Rowland had the childproof locks on, investigators said. She was never seen alive again.

Covered in roughly 120 stab wounds, her body was later found in remote woods about 65 miles (105 kilometers) from Columbia. The death cast a national spotlight on ride-hailing safety and led to some changes, including more prominent displays of driver’s license plates.

Rowland maintained his innocence before being sentenced, but Circuit Judge Clifton Newman noted that each one the evidence pointed to Rowland.“She obviously put up a tremendous fight against you and left a sufficient trail for the jury to ascertain what you probably did ,” Newman said after sentencing Rowland to life in prison. an individual convicted of murder isn’t eligible for parole in South Carolina.

Wearing a mask, Rowland showed little emotion as Josephson’s relatives reflected on the pain of their loss and the way Josephson’s future – the school senior was slated to attend school of law on a full scholarship – was curtail .The prosecution spent a few week presenting voluminous evidence and called nearly three dozen witnesses. Experts linked Josephson’s blood to the inside of Rowland’s Chevrolet Impala and to the suspected murder weapon, a knife with two blades. Her blood was also found on cleaning supplies within the trash behind the house of the man’s girlfriend at the time — and on a sock and bandana owned by Rowland, the experts testified.

Other evidence included cellphone tracking data pinpointing Rowland’s location the night of the crime. One forensic scientist testified that DNA collected from Rowland’s fingernails matched the victim’s genetic material, and DNA belonging to both suspect and victim were found on gloves also located within the trash.

Rowland’s defense attorneys acknowledged that scientists weren’t absolutely certain Rowland’s DNA was on the knife. His attorneys also argued that although Josephson seemed to fight her attacker, none of Rowland’s DNA was found on her body and he had no visible marks of such a fight after his arrest. The defense called no witnesses, and Rowland didn’t testify.

Before resting the defense’s case, Rowland’s lawyer asked the fees be thrown out because prosecutors had a circumstantial case — never showing that Rowland actually killed Josephson nor that he was driving the vehicle when she disappeared.Newman rejected the request, saying there was an avalanche of direct and indirect evidence that a jury should consider.