Rodney Higgins is an Australian Magistrate Know all about him in this article as like his Family, Net Worth, Parents, Wife, Children and Career Rodney Higgins relationship with Ashleigh Petrie
Rodney Higgins is an Australian Magistrate. Higgins worked as a lawyer before being nominated to the Victorian Magistrate Court in 2017.He joined the Labor Party in 1978 and was later a local branch president.
Early Life and Family
Rodney Higgins Born was in 1951, Rodney Higgins worked for decades as a wharfie and union official. He joined the Labor Party in 1978 and was later a local branch president. Through the 1990s, Higgins studied arts and law part-time and was briefly mayor of Moreland, an inner-north municipality.
Rodney Higgins Wife
Mr Higgins, aged 68, had been dating Ms Petrie for seven months and had lived together for around four months before she died. In September of this year, they got engaged.Suddenly, after the engagement the girl Ashleigh, died in a car accident on 28th of October in the year 2019. This incident was assume to be a suicide.
Mr. Higgins is the father of three children and the grandfather of one. He was engaged to Ashleigh Petrie, who died after only a week of their engagement. He then reconciled with his former wife and is now raising a family with her.
Rodney Higgins Net Worth
Rodney Higgins is an Australian Magistrate who has an estimated Net Worth of between $4 million in 2021. The earnings listed mainly come from her salary .
Rodney Higgins relationship with Ashleigh Petrie
A former Victorian magistrate who was engaged to a court clerk 45 years his junior has broken his silence on their controversial relationship almost two years after her death.Rodney Higgins, 71, defended his decision to claim Ashleigh Petrie’s $180,000 superannuation payout even though she had bequeathed the money to her mother.
Before her death, Ms Petrie had taken out life insurance and also had money sitting in her Rest Superannuation account.Despite Ms Petrie’s mother being nominated as the beneficiary of both funds, it was revealed in June that Mr Higgins had claimed the entirety of the money.
The Age revealed Mr Higgins had pocketed the $180,000 payout, despite his partner’s wishes.Mr Higgins, who recently retired from his magistrate position, told A Current Affair that authorities believed he deserved the entirety of the payment.
“They think I deserve 100 per cent of it,” he said.Rest Superannuation had ruled Mr Higgins deserved the money under the Superannuation Industry Act.According to superannuation law, a dependent is the spouse of the person, any child of the person and any person with whom the person has an interdependency relationship.
Mr Higgins told A Current Affair his work had told him to call the superannuation company to tell them Ms Petrie had died.“I did that, they said, ‘What’s your relationship to her?’ I said, ‘I’m her fiance, we live together.’ They said, ‘We will send you paperwork, fill it out and send it back.’ And that was it,” he said.
Ms Petrie’s mother is fighting to receive her late daughter’s death benefit from her superannuation fund and the decision is currently the subject of an appeal before the Australian Financial Complaints Authority.
Mr Higgins admitted the death benefit should’ve been shared with Ms Petrie’s family “in some proportion”.However, he also said he did not like the way the solicitor for Ms Petrie’s mother had been working.In June, a spokesman for Rest Super said that while they could not comment on the specifics of Ms Petrie’s case due to privacy, super funds were bound by laws which govern how death benefits are paid.
“Rest has every sympathy for Ms Petrie’s loved ones and all those grieving her tragic passing,” spokesman Michael Mills said.“In general terms, when a member dies, super funds are required by law to pay the member’s death benefit to a dependent or a legal representative, such as an estate.“
A super fund can only consider paying someone else if they can’t locate either a dependent or estate.“The process of paying a death benefit can involve contested claims and disputes between potential dependants.“Rest always endeavours to handle situations like these with the utmost sensitivity and sympathy.”